- MongoDB CRUD Operations >
- Read Concern >
- Read Concern
"local"
-
"local"
¶
Read Concern "local"
¶
A query with read concern "local"
returns data from the instance
with no guarantee that the data has been written to a majority of the
replica set members (i.e. may be rolled back).
Read concern "local"
is the default for:
- read operations against primary
- read operations against secondaries if the reads are associated with causally consistent sessions.
Regardless of the read concern level, the most recent data on a node may not reflect the most recent version of the data in the system.
Availability¶
Read concern local
is available for use with or without
causally consistent sessions and transactions.
Read Concern "local"
and Transactions¶
You set the read concern at the transaction level, not at the individual operation level. To set the read concern for transactions, see Transactions and Read Concern.
Starting in MongoDB 4.4, with feature compatibility version
(fcv) "4.4"
or greater, you can create
collections and indexes
inside a transaction. If explicitly creating a collection or an
index, the transaction must use read concern
"local"
. Implicit
creation of a collection can use any of the read concerns available
for transactions.
Example¶
Consider the following timeline of a write operation Write0 to a three member replica set:
Note
For simplification, the example assumes:
- All writes prior to Write0 have been successfully replicated to all members.
- Writeprev is the previous write before Write0.
- No other writes have occured after Write0.
Time | Event | Most Recent Write | Most Recent w: “majority” write |
---|---|---|---|
t0 | Primary applies Write0 | Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Writeprev
Secondary2: Writeprev
|
Primary: Writeprev
Secondary1: Writeprev
Secondary2: Writeprev
|
t1 | Secondary1 applies write0 | Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Write0
Secondary2: Writeprev
|
Primary: Writeprev
Secondary1: Writeprev
Secondary2: Writeprev
|
t2 | Secondary2 applies write0 | Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Write0
Secondary2: Write0
|
Primary: Writeprev
Secondary1: Writeprev
Secondary2: Writeprev
|
t3 | Primary is aware of successful replication to Secondary1 and sends acknowledgement to client | Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Write0
Secondary2: Write0
|
Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Writeprev
Secondary2: Writeprev
|
t4 | Primary is aware of successful replication to Secondary2 | Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Write0
Secondary2: Write0
|
Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Writeprev
Secondary2: Writeprev
|
t5 | Secondary1 receives notice (through regular replication mechanism) to update its snapshot of its most recent w: “majority” write | Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Write0
Secondary2: Write0
|
Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Write0
Secondary2: Writeprev
|
t6 | Secondary2 receives notice (through regular replication mechanism) to update its snapshot of its most recent w: “majority” write | Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Write0
Secondary2: Write0
|
Primary: Write0
Secondary1: Write0
Secondary2: Write0
|
Then, the following tables summarizes the state of the data that a read
operation with "local"
read concern would see at
time T
.
Read Target | Time T |
State of Data |
---|---|---|
Primary | After t0 | Data reflects Write0. |
Secondary1 | Before t1 | Data reflects Writeprev |
Secondary1 | After t1 | Data reflects Write0 |
Secondary2 | Before t2 | Data reflects Writeprev |
Secondary2 | After t2 | Data reflects Write0 |